MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312138794 · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.1111463

Editorial: The why of RNA granules: Form, function, and regulation

2022· editorial· en· W4312138794 on OpenAlexafffund
Tomohiro Yamazaki, Timothy E. Audas, Natalie G. Farny

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Molecular Biosciences · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRNAFunction (biology)Rna processingBiologyComputational biologyCell biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Why of RNA Granules: Form, Function, and Regulation RNA granules represent a broad variety of RNA and protein condensates. These granules can be constitutive or stress-induced, nuclear or cytoplasmic, static or dynamic. RNA granules have been functionally associated with a myriad of biological processes and disease states, and the depth of their physiological importance is ever growing. The aim of this Research Topic was to bring together the latest information about the form and function of a diversity of RNA granules. It was our pleasure as guest associate editors to collect and juxtapose these articles, which reveal the breadth of RNA granules and the exciting research frontiers yet to come.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Molecular BiosciencesSame topicRNA Research and SplicingFrench-language works237,207