Le site archéologique du Palais de l'Intendant à Québec. Plus de 35 années de découvertes. Camille Lapointe, Allison Bain, Réginald Auger. Éditions septentrion, Québec, 2019, 186p
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'archéologie québécoise jouit habituellement en France d'a priori favorables, certainement pour deux raisons : la première étant à n'en pas douter que ces maudits Français ont toujours un pincement au cœur quand ils pensent à leurs cousins du Canada, la seconde, plus sérieuse, est peut-être que l'archéologie québécoise a fait découvrir aux Français qu'ils pouvaient faire de l'archéologie moderne et même contemporaine : c'est en partie grâce aux fouilles d'Amérique du Nord qu'on a pu affiner la chronologie des productions de céramiques modernes d'Europe occidentale.C'est donc plein d'un naïf enthousiasme que je me suis chargé de la lecture de ce livre pour en faire la recension.Le site archéologique du Palais de l'Intendant à Québec.Plus de 35 années de...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.060 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".