MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312154094 · doi:10.1177/14413582221143537

The Past, Present and Future of Marketing Research in Australia and New Zealand: A Personal Sampler of Some Key Figures

2022· article· en· W4312154094 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeQuarter (Canadian coin)Key (lock)Marketing researchMarketingManagementPublic relationsSociologyPolitical scienceHistoryBusinessEconomicsLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) and its precursor, the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Marketing Educators Conference (ANZMEC), have been in existence for over a quarter of a century, with ANZMEC being founded in 1996. During that time, many scholars have contributed to research in marketing globally, establishing ANZMAC and its members as significant players internationally. With some of the key founding figures retiring, it is a good time to ensure that the organization’s corporate memory is not lost. In this brief piece I pay tribute to the succeeding waves of scholars who made the Academy the organization that it is today.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralasian Marketing Journal (AMJ)Same topicWine Industry and TourismFrench-language works237,207