MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312177479 · doi:10.18280/ria.360509

Identification and Categorization of Microaneurysms in Optic Images by Applying DTCWT and Log Gabor Characteristics

2022· article· en· W4312177479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sujitha, Subhajini

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCategorizationArtificial intelligenceOphthalmologyOptometryComputer scienceMedicineComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ophthalmology is known as the "virtually silent mobster of vision." Ophthalmology is the leading cause of sight problems globally, aside from Diabetic Retinopathy. Intense pressure within the retina causes damage to the retinal image and, as a consequence, modest but undeniable vision problems. Ophthalmology is frequently obscured in its sufferers expecting final phase because the revival of the deteriorated nervous system fibers isn't suited healing properties. In 2010, it was estimated that approximately 60.5 million people over the age of 40 had cataracts. By 2020, this amount may have risen to 80 million. Recent advent of advanced imaging have resulted in excellent qualitative imaging solutions for the detection and monitoring of ophthalmology. Exterior brightness can be used to effectively complete ophthalmology orders. The fourier channels used in this research are daubechies and symlet3, which would improve the accuracy and performance of cataractous image categorization. A conventional 2-D Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), which is used to automatically extract and assess variations, is used to evaluate those channels. The extracted characteristics are fed into a convolutional machine classification, which distinguishes between physiological and pathological ophthalmology pictures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207