MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312177897 · doi:10.18280/ria.360510

Modified Ant Colony Optimization for Human Recognition in Videos of Low Resolution

2022· article· en· W4312177897 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katakam Ranganarayana, G. Venkateswara Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSupport vector machineComputer visionHistogramPattern recognition (psychology)Background subtractionLocal binary patternsLow resolutionClassifier (UML)RGB color modelPixelHistogram of oriented gradientsHigh resolutionImage (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privacy protections for people filmed in public settings is a prerequisite to widespread camera use. For this reason, low-resolution videos are used from which specific people can be reliably obscured. Since the human region in low-resolution videos comprises of so few pixels and so little information, human detection is more challenging there than it is in high-resolution videos. With the current state of affairs, one of the most important challenges is tracking a target from lower resolution movies. Identification or monitoring of persons in low-resolution movies has become a common issue in many domains due to a lack of appropriate data. This study presents a novel people-detection algorithm that makes use of low-resolution film to overcome the aforementioned problem. In the first stage, a three-step procedure is executed, the video data gathered from low-resolution videos from various form of data is considered. The captured video is separated into frames and transformed from RGB to gray-scale. Local Binary Pattern (LBP) method is used in the second phase to accomplish background subtraction. Thirdly the feature extraction is performed in which histogram of optical flow (HOF)and some of the features are extracted in the form of eigen values. Finally these features are optimized using Modified Ant Colony Optimization (MACO) model to remove the unwanted features and select global features. Finally, classification operation is performed using Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to recognize the person from lower resolution videos. The results obtained using the implemented MACO-SVM obtains good results when compared with existing techniques with rate of accuracy 91.46% for soccer dataset, 90.8% for KTH dataset and 89.75% accuracy using VIRAT dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207