MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312181674 · doi:10.54871/cl4c312a

Piezas sueltas que no encajan. La afectación de la subjetividad en la modernidad actual y en la pandemia

2022· article· es· W4312181674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTramas y Redes · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues and Policies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsNetwork for Business Sustainability
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La pandemia (COVID-19) sumió al planeta en el encierro y el aislamiento con secuelas de depresión, insomnio, angustia y otros males anímicos en la población. Resulta evidente que las personas suelen acostumbrarse al sufrimiento, a pesar de ser una contradicción que distingue a la condición humana. Las personas se conforman con lo que se les aparece como inevitable y hacen de la queja una práctica cotidiana con la que disimular los enigmas que impone la existencia. Este artículo va de las quejas de los seres humanos a la posible formalización de un enigma cuya resolución requiere de elecciones y decisiones. Aunque los modos de vida sin poder frecuentar lazos y espacios sociales retornen a la presencialidad, la angustia se presentifica: ¿qué hago aquí?, ¿cuál es mi deseo y mi actitud ante el amor?, ¿qué camino me conviene tomar? y otras cruciales preguntas que serán abordadas en el presente artículo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it