MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312181685 · doi:10.54871/cl4c314a

La Budapest Open Access Initiative : recomendaciones en su 20º aniversario Autores/as

2022· article· es· W4312181685 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Babini, Leslie Chan, Melissa Hagemann, Heather Joseph, Iryna Kuchma, Peter Suber

Bibliographic record

VenueTramas y Redes · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicScientific Research and Technology
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Iniciativa de Acceso Abierto de Budapest celebró su 20º aniversario el 14 de febrero de 2022. Para conmemorar el aniversario, el comité directivo de la BOAI publica un nuevo conjunto de recomendaciones basadas en sus principios originales, en el momento actual, y en las aportaciones de colegas de todos los ámbitos académicos y regiones del mundo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTramas y RedesSame topicScientific Research and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207