The impact of supply chain integration on strategic performance: The mediating role of strategic vigilance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the impact of supply chain integration through strategic performance and the mediating role of strategic vigilance in industrial companies. The Jordanian population is large and medium-sized, and the study population consists of medium and large-sized industrial companies. For hypothesis testing purposes the study and its model validity, Modeling Equation Structural Analysis (SEM) was used through the AMOS16 program. The study indicates that supply chain integration (strategic integration, internal integration, external integration) has an impact on strategic performance and response. The supply chain, as the results of the study indicated, shows that the response of the supply chain affects strategic performance. The study also found that the response of the supply chain mediates the impact of strategic vigilance on strategic performance. The study recommended working to raise the level of trust and honesty, commitment and attention to the interest of each party to the supply chain to maintain a good level of external integration of the supply chain and work to improve the level of supply chain response to markets and any changes that may occur in the market through corporate restructuring and streamlining working procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".