Does social customer relationship management (SCRM) affect customers’ happiness and retention? A service perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main aim of this study is to examine the effects of social customer relationship management (CRM) on customer happiness and customer retention. To achieve the study objectives, a quantitative research method is adopted in this study to examine the hypotheses by using a survey questionnaire for the purpose of data collection from the target sample of customers of telecommunication firms working in Jordan. The instrument is designed and customized to conduct this study and meet the research objectives. A total of 319 valid and reliable responses are returned and they are analyzed using the SEM approach through SmartPLS3 software to examine the hypotheses. The findings reveal significant and positive effects of the most social CRM elements studied on customer happiness and the customer happiness influenced customer retention. The study contributes to the respective research field with further better understanding of the role of social CRM to increase customer happiness and retain long term relationships with them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it