MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312191296 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2022-0251

Solvation thermodynamics of four amino acids in electrolytic solutions of sodium and potassium iodide salts at 298.15 K

2022· article· en· W4312191296 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Simanta Kundu, Kalachand Mahali, Sanϳay Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistrySolvationSolubilityAqueous solutionEnthalpyApparent molar propertyGibbs free energyElectrolyteThermodynamicsInorganic chemistrySolventPartial molar propertyMolar volumePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solubility and thermodynamics of solvation due to solute–solvent interactions of glycine, DL-alanine, DL-serine, and DL-valine were determined in this study. Mainly, the transfer of Gibbs free energies from aqueous to aqueous sodium and potassium iodide salt solutions was considered, which were calculated by direct experimental solubility data and via theoretical calculations. The equilibrium solubilities were measured at 298.15 K using simple “formol titration”. Various important physicochemical factors like enthalpy of solvation, molar volume, molar mass, molar density, etc., in aqueous electrolyte solutions were calculated at standard temperature. The thermodynamic parameters were explained to conclude about the virtual stability of the zwitterionic solutes in aqueous salt mixtures. The factors that are associated with solubility were also explained and correlated with physical and thermodynamic point of view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207