MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312192197 · doi:10.1080/21640629.2022.2161119

Editorial: In the interest of discussion, debate, and future possibilities

2022· editorial· en· W4312192197 on OpenAlexaff
Robyn L. Jones, Jim Denison, Charles L. T. Corsby

Bibliographic record

VenueSports Coaching Review · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSport Psychology and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering ethicsEpistemologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Having been formally launched in 2012, this passing year marks the 10-year anniversary of SCR. As many of you know, SCR is a journal dedicated to the critical analysis of sports coaching, thus offe...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0270.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSports Coaching ReviewSame topicSport Psychology and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207