MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312192242 · doi:10.1086/722589

Pastoral between Words and Things: Theocritus, Ekphrasis, and Ontology

2022· article· en· W4312192242 on OpenAlexaff
Yukai Li

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical Philology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIronyNegationMateriality (auditing)PhilosophyObject (grammar)Meaning (existential)LiteratureOntologyEpistemologyLinguisticsAestheticsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes that the problem of pastoral irony (as formulated in Harry Berger’s seminal article on strong and weak pastoral) and the nature of ekphrasis are both clarified if they are understood as expressions of the desire for an escape from meaningful, signifying language and into the materiality of objects. Drawing on responses to Theocritus, readings of ekphrasis, and philosophical interpretations of the boundary between words and things, I argue that pastoral irony represents an initial moment of escape from signification, and ekphrasis a final moment of representing objects, mediated by a paradoxical object representing the negation of meaning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.061
Scholarly communication0.0080.014
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical PhilologySame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207