Artificial intelligence-based volumetric analysis of muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration in patients with hip osteoarthritis and its correlation with health-related quality of life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have enabled precise three-dimensional analysis of individual muscles on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance images via automatic segmentation. This study aimed to perform three-dimensional assessments of pelvic and thigh muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis using CT and to evaluate the correlation with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: The study included one man and 43 women. Six muscle groups were segmented, and the muscle atrophy ratio was calculated volumetrically. The degree of fatty degeneration was defined as the difference between the mean CT values (Hounsfield units [HU]) of the healthy and affected sides. HRQoL was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). RESULTS: The mean muscle atrophy rate was 16.3%, and the mean degree of muscle fatty degeneration was 7.9 HU. Multivariate correlation analysis revealed that the WOMAC stiffness subscale was significantly related to fatty degeneration of the hamstrings, the WOMAC physical function subscale was significantly related to fatty degeneration of the iliopsoas muscle, and the JHEQ movement subscale was significantly related to fatty degeneration of the hip adductors. CONCLUSION: We found that fatty degeneration of the hamstrings, iliopsoas, and hip adductor muscles was significantly related to HRQoL in patients with hip osteoarthritis. These findings suggest that these muscles should be targeted during conservative rehabilitation for HOA and perioperative rehabilitation for THA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".