MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312195548 · doi:10.1177/15500594221147138

Response to Hydrocortisone in an Extremely Preterm Neonate With Late-Onset Sepsis, Meningoencephalitis, and Drug-Resistant Seizures

2022· article· en· W4312195548 on OpenAlexafffund
Ralf Eberhard, Katryn Paquette, Jarred Garfinkle, Kenneth A. Myers

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical EEG and Neuroscience · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KeywordsPhenytoinHydrocortisoneMedicinePhenobarbitalStatus epilepticusMeningitisMeningoencephalitisAnesthesiaLevetiracetamEpilepsySepsisMidazolamPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicineSedationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corticosteroids are commonly used in children with bacterial meningitis; however, there are very few data regarding possible utility in neonates, particularly those born premature. We describe our experience using hydrocortisone in the treatment of a girl born at 26 weeks, 6 days gestation. She had suffered profound brain injury following late onset group B streptococcus sepsis and meningitis, and developed drug-resistant seizures. Because seizures continued despite treatment with phenobarbital, phenytoin, levetiracetam, lacosamide, and midazolam, intravenous hydrocortisone was added. We observed a marked decrease in focal electrographic seizures within 2 days of initiation of hydrocortisone. This experience suggests that corticosteroids could be a treatment option for drug-resistant seizures and status epilepticus in preterm neonates, particularly those with bacterial meningitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical EEG and NeuroscienceSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207