MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Barriers to The Transition from Supply Chain 4.0 (SC4.0) To Supply Chain 5.0 (SC5.0)

2022· article· en· W4312198903 on OpenAlexaff
Arshil Ahmad, Hisham Fazal Syed, Jay Joshi, Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Marketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supply Chain 4.0 (SC4.0) is an enhanced account of the supply chain that consists of artificial intelligence, cloud, and data analysis, whereas Supply Chain 5.0 (SC5.0) is a visionary aspect of the supply chain to succeed SC4.0 by customizing consumer requirements by combining machine proficiency and human efforts. Irrespective of abundant growth in SC4.0 technologies, SC5.0 weighs on human interface with technological advancements for the betterment of supply chain activities, which in turn benefits society and reflects the importance of the concept of this research. The literature review and methodology provide further understanding of the subject by explaining software use on the surveys to accumulate responses based on automation, demand, societal requirements, and so on. Barriers to this transformation result in a clarification of the challenges that the world will face for the successful transformation from SC4.0 to SC5.0. Overall, this study focuses on providing various factors on the transition of SC4.0 to SC5.0 that could combine human brain and technology for improved results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)Same topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207