FORMATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STATUS OF THE TUVAN STATE IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20 TH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье исследуется процесс становления международно - правового статуса Тувы в первой четверти Х Х в. На примере истории Тувы анализируется степень влияния политического фактора на процесс международного признания нового государства. В начале века, после распада Цинской империи и кратковременного периода самостоятельности, Тува включена в состав Российской империи. После распада Российской империи в результате самоопределения тувинский народ создал свое суверенное государство. Во второй половине 1920 - х гг. международно - правовое признание тувинского государства оформлено заключением двусторонних договоров с двумя соседними государствами - С С С Р и М Н Р. The article examines the process of formation of the international legal status of Tuva in the first quarter of the 20th century. On the example of the history of Tuva, the degree of influence of the political factor on the process of international recognition of the new state is analyzed. At the beginning of the century, after the collapse of the Qing Empire, and a short period of independence, Tuva was incorporated into the Russian Empire. After the collapse of the Russian Empire, as a result of self - determination, the Tuvan people created their own sovereign state. In the second half of the 1920s, the international legal recognition of the Tuvan state was formalized by the conclusion of bilateral treaties with two neighboring states - the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the Mongolian People's Republic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".