MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312219299 · doi:10.54691/bcpbm.v34i.3155

Time Series Analysis of China’s Air Passenger Traffic Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

2022· article· en· W4312219299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBCP Business & Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaAviationAir traffic controlLiberalizationCivil aviationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Granger causalityDistributed lagBusinessEconomicsGeographyEngineeringEconometricsMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China’s air transportation industry has a great development in recent decades along with economic growth and liberalization. However, the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on China’s civil aviation industry is severe and persistent. The paper discusses the development of China’s air transportation and examines the impact of the pandemic on airline industry. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) Model and Granger Causality test will be used to investigate the relationships between China’s air passenger traffic and its potential factors including the new COVID-19 cases in China, the Consumer Price Index and unemployment rate in China. The investigation concludes that China’s air passenger traffic is closely related to its own past observations, and the past observations of new infected cases in China is significant in forecasting air passenger traffic. The ADL model forecasts China’s air passenger traffic will have an increasing trend in the following years, but it will still require longer time to recover from the COVID-19 impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it