Constitutive Feelings for the Life of the State: Edith Stein’s Political Phenomenology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aunque cada vez haya más estudios sobre la forma en que Edith Stein entendía el estado, especialmente en lo que respecta a las cuestiones de autonomía, del derecho a priori y de la vida social y comunitaria del estado, hay pocos estudios sobre el sentimiento o el afecto en la estructura del estado. Este ensayo, siguiendo la idea de Anneliese Meis Wörmer sobre la importancia central del sentimiento en la filosofía de Stein, sostiene que el estado debe permitir también la posibilidad del sentimiento. Para ello, considero que el estado se constituye en parte por los sentimientos de solidaridad y el sentimiento por la justicia o por lo recto [Rechtsgefühl]. El primer aspecto forma parte de la vida social y comunitaria del estado, mientras que el segundo debe entenderse como concomitante con la estructura misma de la ley como expresión de la soberanía estatal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".