MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312236849 · doi:10.7146/spr.v14i43.114527

Elevers hjemmesprog: Ven eller fjende?

2008· article· da· W4312236849 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patricia Chow, Zarina Khan, Padma Sastri, Alison Shirashi, Lisa Leoni, Sarah Cohen, Jim Cummins

Bibliographic record

VenueSprogforum Tidsskrift for sprog- og kulturpædagogik · 2008
Typearticle
Languageda
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational and Psychological Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesVenArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kulturel og sproglig mangfoldighed er blevet det normale i skoler i større byer i Nordamerika, Europa og Australien. For eksempel har mere end 50 % af eleverne i Toronto og Vancouver en ikke-engelsktalende baggrund, og i andre større canadi- ske byer findes der også store grupper elever der repræsenterer en kulturel og sprog- lig forskellighed. (...)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.183
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSprogforum Tidsskrift for sprog- og kulturpædagogikSame topicEducational and Psychological AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207