MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312244495 · doi:10.35622/j.rie.2021.01.008.en

The Role of Teachers' Beliefs in Family Engagement

2021· article· en· W4312244495 on OpenAlex
Mauricio Rodríguez-Herrera

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Innova Educación · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
FundersUniversidad Autónoma de TlaxcalaUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid
KeywordsAffect (linguistics)Promotion (chess)InstitutionThe ImaginaryPsychologyWork (physics)Educational institutionField (mathematics)Social psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPedagogySociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The school as an institution continues to be an organization made up of individuals, who can effectively alter reality within the school structure. This work consists of an exploration of the role of teachers' beliefs in family participation. For this, teaching beliefs, academic performance, expectations, and family participation were defined as fundamental concepts when it came to understanding the explored role. The objective of this work, to evaluate how teachers' beliefs affect parental participation, was approached from a review of the main investigations that have been generated in regard to the field of educational knowledge. As the central axis, beliefs are effectively deepened and among the main conclusions it is highlighted that the promotion of parental participation by teachers depends directly on the imaginary, culture, and beliefs that this group has on the positive impact or rejection of parental participation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it