Contrastive Learning for Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Using Brain 18F-FDG PET
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brain 18F-FDG PET images are commonly-known materials for effectively predicting Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the data volume of PET is usually insufficient, which is unfavorable to train an accurate AD prediction networks. Furthermore, the PET image is noisy with low signal-to-noise ratio, and simultaneously the feature (metabolic abnormality) used for predicting AD in PET image is not always obvious. Therefore, a contrastive-based learning method is proposed to address the challenges of PET image inherently possessed. Firstly, the slices of 3D PET image are amplified by cropping the image of anchors (i.e., an augmented version of the same image) to generate extended training data. Meanwhile, contrastive loss is adopted to enlarge inter-class feature distances and reduce intra-class feature differences using subject fuzzy labels as supervised information. Secondly, we construct a double convolutional hybrid attention module to enhance the network to learn different perceptual domains where two convolutional layers with different convolutional kernels ($7\times 7$ and $5\times 5$) are constructed. Moreover, we recommend a diagnosis mechanism by analyzing the consistency of predicted result for PET slices alone with clinical neuropsychological assessment to achieve a better AD diagnosis. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-arts for brain 18F-FDG PET images, and hence demonstrate the advantage of the method in effectively predicting AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it