Bibliographic record
Abstract
La poésie-performance peut s’envisager comme une sorte de suture sémiotique entre la poésie et l’art performance. Offrant un compte-rendu de la pratique du poète-performeur Sébastien Dulude, le livre Chambres (2013) soulève des questions sur le statut du livre et de la documentation de la performance. C’est principalement dans le sillage de Philip Auslander que s’inscrit cet article dans lequel interviennent les notions de performativité et celle de documentation. La question de l’ontologie de la performance chez Peggy Phelan, celle de l’archive chez Christophe Kihm et celle du régime ontologique chez Gérard Genette sont aussi convoquées dans cette réflexion. Les enjeux sémiotiques du document et de la documentation textuelle et photographique, de même que l’idée du livre comme performance sont ainsi abordés dans un souci de cerner un peu mieux le statut de ce « livre de poésie-performance ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".