Bibliographic record
Abstract
"Dans un court texte de son livre Historias de Cronopios y de Famas (1962) intitulé "anicroches dans \nles services publics", l’écrivain argentin Julio Cortàzar imagine que le directeur général de la radio, \n"Cronope" décide un jour de faire traduire tous les bulletins d’informations, les publicités, les chansons \ndiffusés sur les ondes en roumain, "langue fort peu répandue en Argentine" précise-t-il. Les \nauditeurs ne comprennent rien, s’étonnent, secouent leurs postes, mais la radio continue d’émettre \nen roumain, "y compris le célèbre tango Ce soir je me soûle". Ils téléphonent pour protester, mais \nau standard on ne leur répond qu’en roumain. Bref, ce changement produit une grande pagaille. \nLe gouvernement fait fusiller le directeur et nomme à sa place un "Fameux" chargé de remettre \nde l’ordre et qui rétablit la langue nationale sur les ondes. Mais, une partie de la population avait \nacheté des manuels et des dictionnaires de roumain, langue qui devient à la mode, au grand dam du \ngouvernement, et certains allaient même secrètement se recueillir sur la tombe de feu le directeur, \n"Cronope" et roumanophile, de la radio. [...]"
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".