MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312275195 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2022.3227261

Object Identification With Minimal Precomputed Library Using Physical Aspect of Singularity Expansion Method

2022· article· en· W4312275195 on OpenAlexaff
Nandan Bhattacharyya, Jawad Y. Siddiqui, Yahia M. M. Antar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingularityA priori and a posterioriDimension (graph theory)Computer scienceMatrix pencilObject (grammar)AlgorithmResonance (particle physics)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionMathematicsGeometryPhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we propose a method for estimating the circumferential length of metal objects without any <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a priori</i> information regarding object shape and dimension. Object type can also be determined using this method with a reduced precomputed library consisting of the quality factor of fundamental natural resonance frequency and the ratio of second-order to first-order damped resonance frequency for each object type. The proposed method is applied to identify different canonical objects. Natural resonance frequencies, extracted using the matrix pencil method of singularity expansion from the scattered field from different metal objects, have been validated with physical reasoning. Simple methods for predicting the resonance frequency of triangular plates and discs have been proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207