Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El modelo nórdico es bien conocido por sus exitosos resultados en las sociedades que lo adoptan. Dinamarca, Finlandia, Islandia, Noruega y Suecia encabezan una amplia gama de índices e indicadores a nivel mundial. Sin embargo, aún se desconocen varios aspectos del funcionamiento de estos estados de bienestar, de modo que existen algunos mitos comunes sobre ellos. En ese contexto, identificamos las principales características del modelo nórdico y señalamos los hechos más relevantes dentro de cada nación. Asimismo, comparamos los resultados en los países nórdicos con los de los países latinoamericanos. Luego, consideramos las principales críticas a este modelo en cuatro ámbitos: economía, mercado laboral, educación y cultura. Por último, presentamos una valoración general de las ventajas y desventajas del modelo nórdico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it