MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312285240 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3210491

A Deep-Learning-Based Microwave Radiative Transfer Emulator for Data Assimilation and Remote Sensing

2022· article· en· W4312285240 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xingming Liang, Kevin Garrett, Quanhua Liu, Eric S. Maddy, Kayo Ide, Sid‐Ahmed Boukabara

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsBrightness temperatureRadiative transferComputer scienceRemote sensingNumerical weather predictionAtmospheric radiative transfer codesEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyData assimilationMicrowaveGeologyTelecommunicationsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce a fully connected deep neural network algorithm to emulate the Community Cadiative Transfer Model (FCDN_CRTM) simulation of brightness temperatures (BTs) from the Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) channels for clear-sky cases over ocean surfaces. The FCDN_CRTM fine-tuned through three sensitivity experiments with respect to sample-size determination, model separation, and introduction of novel features toward improving the accuracy of the model. In addition to the BT simulation, we evaluated the Jacobians with respect to surface and atmospheric parameters. Atmosphere profiles from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, sea surface temperature from the Canadian Meteorology Centre, and ATMS sensor data records were used as FCDN_CRTM inputs. In comparison to CRTM, the FCDN_CRTM minus CRTM mean biases were within several hundredths of a Kelvin (K), and the corresponding standard deviations (SDs) were between 0.05 and 0.15 K for all ATMS bands. The accuracies for both mean bias and SD were consistent throughout the evaluation period, which spanned approximately 1 year beyond the period of the FCDN_CRTM training dataset. Furthermore, the model Jacobians generally compared well with CRTM Jacobians in terms of surface temperature, wind speed, air temperature, and (log) water vapor. The performance of the FCDN_CRTM forward and Jacobian model indicate potential for use in data assimilation and physical retrieval systems, such as the NOAA operational Microwave Integrated Retrieval System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207