A TD-Learning Based Bionic Cerebellar Model Controller For Humanoid Robots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cerebellum is a crucial component of the human body that plays a vital role in human walking. To design a robot gait controller by referring the working mechanism of the cerebellum is one of the hotspots in the bionic control field. This paper designs a bionic cerebellar motion control model to control the slope gait of a humanoid robot. The cerebellum model refers to the connection method between neurons in a human cerebellum, and expresses from a bionic perspective how the neurons in the cerebellum process external information and generate control commands during walking. Inspired by how human walking is learned, this model employs reinforcement learning in the learning process of the bionic cerebellar model. A corresponding simulation environment is also designed to train and test the cerebellar control model's effectiveness when regulating a robot's slope walking stability. The simulation experimental results demonstrate that the cerebellum model can achieve stable control of the walking motion of the humanoid robot after training, verifying its effectiveness, and laying a foundation for further realization of human-like artificial intelligence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".