Hemisection as an Alternative Treatment for Mandibular Molars with Separated Instrument: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemisection is a procedure involving the removal of an untreatable root with an accompanied crown portion while saving the other healthy root with adequate bone support. This case report represents the treatment of 2nd mandibular molar with irretrievable and unable to bypass separated instruments in the mesiobuccal canal of the mesial root. After sectioning the tooth, mesial root with the crown portion was extracted, and the remaining part of the tooth was restored as a premolar. Restorative rehabilitation was done by cementing a three-unit metal ceramic bridge. The good outcomes of endodontic treatment and patient demand towards the conservation of tooth encouraged the procedure of hemisection. For the preservation of terminal mandibular molars with irretrievable and unable to bypass separated instruments, hemisection can be considered as an alternative treatment option our objective is to conserve terminal mandibular molar with adequate bone support as a replacement in this area is complex, time consuming, and costly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".