MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nonlinear Network Equivalents of Systems with Inverter Based Resources to Study Unbalanced Faults in Steady State

2022· article· en· W4312316071 on OpenAlexaff
Ilhan Koçar, Yuanzhu Chang, Renan M. Furlaneto, Ahda P. Grilo, Aboutaleb Haddadi, Evangelos Farantatos

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThévenin's theoremInverterEquivalent circuitFault (geology)Nonlinear systemSequence (biology)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceInterconnectionVoltageEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a method to obtain steady state short circuit network equivalents of systems with Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs) in the positive and negative sequence domains. Such an equivalent model improves the efficiency of short circuit simulation studies by reducing the computational burden while preserving simulation accuracy. The proposed network equivalent in the positive sequence domain consists of a Thevenin equivalent circuit in parallel with a voltage dependent nonlinear current source to account for the combination of conventional synchronous generators and IBRs. The representation in the negative sequence system depends on the fault-ride-through requirements, IBR type, and IBR control scheme. The proposed network equivalents in the positive and negative sequence domains are shown to successfully reproduce the fault response of a detailed system at a given point of interconnection with an external network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207