MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312331642 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3223689

Winter Sea-Ice Lead Detection in Arctic Using FY-3D MERSI-II Data

2022· article· en· W4312331642 on OpenAlexaff
Qingmin Wang, Mohammed Shokr, Shiyi Chen, Zhaojun Zheng, Xiao Cheng, Fengming Hui

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLead (geology)Brightness temperatureSea iceEnvironmental scienceThermal infraredSatelliteArcticRemote sensingArctic ice packOpen waterGeologyBrightnessInfraredClimatologyOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead is an important feature of the Arctic ice cover, with possible contents of thin ice /or open water. In this letter, we present an algorithm for lead detection based on brightness temperature observations from a single thermal infrared channel of MERSI-II onboard the Chinese FY-3D satellite. Lead contents is classified into open water and thin ice with support information from Sentinel-1 SAR data. Results are evaluated based on visual interpretation of MERSI-II TIR (Thermal infrared) and Sentinel-2 NIR (Near Infrared) data. The accuracy is found to be 85.6% for lead detection and 67% and 52% for thin ice and open water within the lead, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207