MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312339434 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3222842

Transform-Domain Federated Learning for Edge-Enabled IoT Intelligence

2022· article· en· W4312339434 on OpenAlexaff
Lei Zhao, Lin Cai, Wu-Sheng Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDiscrete cosine transformEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDomain (mathematical analysis)Edge computingInternet of ThingsEdge deviceArtificial intelligenceDiscrete wavelet transformWavelet transformDeep learningData miningDistributed computingComputer engineeringMachine learningEmbedded systemWaveletCloud computingImage (mathematics)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated learning (FL) deployed in the edge network environment is a promising approach for combining the separated training results based on the isolated local data sensed by various Internet of Things (IoT) devices. However, the limited computing resources for the training of various application models in each edge server and the communication burden among the edge server and numerous IoT devices greatly impact the realization of IoT intelligence. In this article, we propose transform-domain FL schemes based on discrete cosine transform (DCT-FA) and discrete wavelet transform (DWT-FA) to achieve better training efficiency and reduce the communication burden for IoT devices. Furthermore, when the amount of training data is limited, we propose to combine time-domain features and frequency-domain features in FL (CDCT-FA) that turns out to achieve much higher test accuracy. From the experimental results, the transform-domain FL schemes are shown to be promising, given the different constraints and requirements of various IoT intelligence applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0220.012
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207