MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Un carnet inédit de portraits florentins de Wicar

2007· book-chapter· fr· W4312345609 on OpenAlexaff
Arnauld Brejon de Lavergnée

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsNational Museum of Fine Arts of Quebec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortraitGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille conserve depuis 1900 un carnet de dessins et de portraits réalisés par Wicar durant son long séjour en Italie. Certains dessins ont figuré à une exposition temporaire (Le portrait de Caterina Christofori, fig. 7, d’autres ont été mentionnés (Pietro Bastianelly, directeur de la galerie de Florence, fig. 2) mais le joli album qui certes a été décrit par Beaucamp n’a pas été publié en son intégralité, alors qu’il le mérite amplement. Par le biais des actes de c...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires du Septentrion eBooksSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207