MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312347804 · doi:10.4000/cal.14363

Flávia Biroli, Maria das Dores Campos Machado, Juan Marco Vaggione, Gênero, neoconservadorismo e democracia: disputas e retrocessos na América Latina

2021· article· pt· W4312347804 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers des Amériques latines · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage est le fruit d’une collaboration entre le Brésil et l’Argentine, organisé et écrit par Flávia Biroli, Maria das Dores Campos Machado et Juan Marco Vaggione. Il a été publié en septembre 2020 chez Boitempo, pour les 25 ans de la IVe Conférence mondiale sur les femmes : luttes pour l’égalité, le développement et la paix, tenue sous l’égide de l’Organisation des Nations unies à Pékin entre le 4 et le 15 septembre 1995. À l’échelle latino-américaine, les auteur·ices pensent la consolida...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it