MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RTCE: Real-Time Co-Emulation Framework for EMT-Based Power System and Communication Network on FPGA-MPSoC Hardware Architecture

2022· article· en· W4312349893 on OpenAlexaff
Tong Duan, Zhen Huang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmulationMPSoCHardware emulationComputer scienceEmbedded systemField-programmable gate arraySoftwareLatency (audio)Computer architectureSystem on a chipOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expansion of smart grid infrastructure world-wide, modeling the interaction between power systems and communication networks becomes paramount and has created a new challenge of co-simulating the two domains before commissioning. Existing co-simulation methods mostly concentrate on the off-line software-level interface design to synchronize messages between the simulators of both domains. Instead of simulating in software with a large latency, this article proposes a novel real-time co-emulation (RTCE) framework on FPGA-MPSoC based hardware architecture for a more practical emulation of real-world cyber-physical systems. The discrete-time based power system electromagnetic transient (EMT) emulation is executed in programmable hardware units so that the transient-level behaviour can be captured in real-time, while the discrete-event based communication network emulation is modeled in abstraction-level or directly executed on the hardware PHY and network ports of the FPGAMPSoC platform, which can perform the communication networking in real-time. The data exchange between two domains is handled within each platform with an extremely low latency, which is sufficiently fast for real-time interaction; and the multi-board scheme is deployed to practically emulate the communication between different power system areas. The hardware resource cost and emulation latency for the test system and case studies are evaluated to demonstrate the validity and effectiveness of the proposed RTCE framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207