MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312358431 · doi:10.1115/ipc2022-87793

X80 Heavy Gauge and Large Diameter Helical Line Pipe for Low Temperature Applications

2022· article· en· W4312358431 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Gaudet, Muhammad Rashid, Ahmad van der Breggen, K. Dunnett, Muhammad Arafin

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsEVRAZ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthToughnessMetallurgyMicrostructureMartensiteOptical microscopeCharpy impact testAusteniteComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Demand for improved pipeline efficiency has directed designs towards larger diameters and higher operating pressures. High strength steel with increased wall thicknesses of the pipe provide for greater available pressure capacity for the pipeline. However, toughness of the line pipe, particularly at low temperature, is challenged when increasing the strength of the steel and with a greater wall thickness of the pipe. This work discusses the efforts to optimize alloy and thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP) designs to achieve X80 with good low temperature toughness. Two X80 helical line pipe steel designs are presented; X80-A with low Ni and X80-B with high Ni with gauges of 18.5 mm and 19.1 mm, respectively. This material was cast, rolled, and formed into pipe as part of production trials. Processing data is presented and shows good consistency was achieved in the trials. Results from the tensile and drop weight tear tests (DWTT) are discussed. Both X80-A and X80-B met tensile requirements for an X80 material with an average yield strength of 614 MPa and 586 MPa. In terms of DWTT, X80-A passed −5°C whereas X80-B passed both −20°C and −30°C. In terms of microstructures, nital and LePera etchings along with optical microscopy showed that X80-A and X80-B have fine grain ferrite microstructures with a minimal amount of martensite/retained austenite. A larger data set consisting of X70 and X80 material from production and trials within the gauge range of 17.8 mm to 20.3 mm are introduced. The data set shows some expected general trends such as decreasing DWTT performance with increases to strength. Various TMCP factors such as roughing last pass temperature and mean flow stress as well as microstructure are also discussed with respect to their impact on DWTT results. Low Ni contents are shown on average to perform better than other levels in the current data set, owing mainly to the optimization efforts of developing a −5°C X80 product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207