MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312361430 · doi:10.56899/151.s1.01

The Gregorio T. Velasquez Phycological Herbarium (MSI): a Legacy and National Heritage

2021· article· en· W4312361430 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Edna T. Ganzon-Fortes, Wilfred John Santiañez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Philippine journal of science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsHerbariumGeographyArchaeologyLibrary scienceAncient historyHistoryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present here the history and contents of one of the most important herbaria in the Philippines – the Gregorio T. Velasquez Phycological Herbarium of the Marine Science Institute (MSI) at the University of the Philippines (UP) Diliman. The MSI herbarium was established in the early 1970s by Dr. Gavino C. Trono Jr. and was named in honor of his mentor Dr. Gregorio T. Velasquez, the “Father of Philippine Phycology.” Collections in the MSI herbarium are primarily made by Filipino phycologists within the coasts and offshore islands and reefs of the Philippines. The MSI herbarium currently holds ~ 55,000 algal and seagrass specimens collected from various areas in the country and abroad. As the largest repository of marine plants in the Philippines and the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) region, we consider the MSI herbarium as both a legacy and national heritage that we owe to the pillars of Philippine phycology – Dr. Gavino C. Trono Jr. and the late Dr. Gregorio T. Velasquez.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Philippine journal of science→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→