Integrated optical phased arrays with circular architecture on a silicon platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical phased arrays (OPAs) are now at the forefront of photonic research as a key beam steering technology for myriad of photonic applications, including in light detection and ranging (LIDAR), communications, and metrology, among others. Integrated OPAs with narrow beam widths and wide-angle steering are in critical need, especially for LIDARs in autonomous vehicle, drone and airplane navigation, or satellites. In this work, we numerically study the performances of OPAs having a circular layout arrangement. Compared to recently available solutions with 1D linear or 2D rectangular arrays, the proposed circular OPAs are poised to deliver effective suppression of the grating sidelobes, while improving beam steering range and obtaining narrower beamwidths. We demonstrate 110-element circular arrays with sidelobe suppression better than 10 dB and an angular beamwidth of 0.5°. Under a monochromatic operation at a 1550 nm wavelength, such array provides a solid angle steering range of 0.21π-sr, with a perspective for performance improvement by using large number of OPA elements and operating under broader spectral range.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".