THE PROBLEM OF THE HISTORICAL CONTINUITY OF ALL-UNION LENINIST YOUNG COMMUNIST LEAGUE AND YOUTH PARLIAMENTARISM IN RUSSIA IN THE LAST QUARTER OF THE XX CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The articledeals with the historical experience of the development of Russian youth parliamentarism. The author examines the possibility of continuity of organization and functions between the consultative and advisory bodies of young parliamentarians of post-Soviet Russia and the institutions of All-Union Leninist Young Communist Leaguein 1918-1991. It is formulated that the fundamental differences between the activities of All-Union Leninist Young Communist Leagueand the youth parliamentarism of recent Russian history. It argues for the idea that they consist in a mismatch of ideological attitudes, organizational structure and functional purpose of the subjects under consideration. At the same time, a certain historical continuity of post-Soviet youth parliamentarism in relation to All-Union Leninist Young Communist League of the USSR is stressed. In conclusion muchattention is drawn to the same legal format of activity as public organizations, as well as in the tasks of forming a personnel reserve to replenish the ranks of political elites and the adminis-trative apparatus of the state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".