MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312368300 · doi:10.26034/lu.akwi.2020.3271

Optimization of Work-Center Cycle Time Target Setting in a Semiconductor Wafer Fab

2020· article· en· W4312368300 on OpenAlex
Hermann Gold, Hannah Dusch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnwendungen und Konzepte der Wirtschaftsinformatik · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
FundersInfineon Technologies
KeywordsNormalization (sociology)WaferSquare rootPosition (finance)Center (category theory)Computer scienceSquare (algebra)SemiconductorReal-time computingEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringChemistryCrystallographyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper the problem of assigning target cycle times at operation level in a semiconductor wafer fab, where target end-to-end-delays are given, is considered.In the original position allowed waiting times are assigned at processing stations proportional to the square root of processing times. We apply the fairness principle which claims that waiting times should be proportional to processing times at so-called machine resource pools. To match overall cycle time targets the normalization constants are adjusted using LP and QP methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it