MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312371036 · doi:10.5751/ace-02328-170239

Using tracking technology to locate endangered ʻuaʻu or Hawaiian Petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis) burrows

2022· article· en· W4312371036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
André F. Raine, Alex X. Wang, Bret N. Mossman, Scott Driskill

Bibliographic record

VenueAvian Conservation and Ecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurrowSeabirdEndangered speciesPetrelGeographyEcologyFisheryHabitatBiologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ʻuaʻu, or Hawaiian Petrel, Pterodroma sandwichensis, is an endangered seabird endemic to the Hawaiian Islands. Although its distribution on some of the islands is well documented, on larger islands such as Hawaiʻi there are significant distribution gaps. Previous work within the Puʻu O ʻUmi Natural Area Reserve (NAR) on Hawaiʻi strongly suggested that a breeding colony of the species was present, but active burrows had not been located making it difficult to focus management actions. Searching for burrows of this nocturnal burrow-nesting seabird had been particularly challenging in the NAR, as the birds are very rare, widely dispersed, and breeding in remote areas with dense vegetation and challenging topography. To locate active burrows, we employed the use of tracking devices to track breeding adults back to their burrows. Six data loggers (e-obs Bird Solar 10g) were attached to transiting birds caught using lights in 2018 and 2019. Overland locational data was then interrogated for concentrated areas of circling and ground activity. This resulted in several areas of concentrated activity and two different locations where tracked birds ended up transmitting from the ground. Burrow searching teams were then deployed to these areas and an active Hawaiian Petrel burrow was located. This represents the first active burrow ever documented in the NAR and the entirety of Kohala Mountain. Management actions have since been initiated to protect birds breeding within the areas defined by our tracking data. Logistical and methodological considerations inherent in the use of telemetry for locating endangered seabird colonies are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvian Conservation and EcologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207