Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce chapitre présente les résultats d’un travail de recherche effectué auprès d’entrepreneurs immigrants maghrébins à Montréal. Ces entrepreneurs ont choisi d’investir le marché des produits religieux musulmans. Nous avons mis l’accent sur l’influence des dimensions religieuses dans les pratiques managériales et entrepreneuriales de ces entrepreneurs. Des entretiens semi-directifs ont été effectués auprès de quarante-cinq entrepreneuses et entrepreneurs dans la région de Montréal. Les résultats montrent un effet important des valeurs religieuses et spirituelles sur les décisions et les pratiques managériales des entrepreneurs. Nous avons constaté également que la dimension religieuse permet de dépasser l’opposition nécessité/opportunité associée aux motivations entrepreneuriales. Les résultats révèlent également que les stratégies managériales des entrepreneurs varient selon leur degré de croyance et de pratiques religieuses. À partir de nos résultats, nous proposons un modèle décrivant le processus de prise de décision du choix entrepreneurial des immigrants musulmans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".