MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312404547 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2022.3222368

Compact 26–30 GHz Reflection-Type Phase Shifter With 8-Bit Switched Phase Tuning Utilizing Chalcogenide Phase-Change Switches

2022· article· en· W4312404547 on OpenAlexafffund
Tejinder Singh, Raafat R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhase shift moduleInsertion lossMaterials scienceReturn lossReconfigurabilityFigure of meritOptoelectronicsTrue time delayBandwidth (computing)Reflection lossPhased arrayElectrical engineeringOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsMicrowaveEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports the first implementation of a 8-bit millimeter-wave (mmWave) reflection-type phase shifter (RTPS) based on phase change material (PCM) germanium telluride (GeTe). The switched phase shifter employs a compact co-planar waveguide (CPW)-based quadrature coupler in folded tandem configuration monolithically integrated with two identical reconfigurable reflective loads optimized to achieve a large phase shift range. Reconfigurability is achieved using eight identical latching PCM switches to load or unload a desired reflective load while consuming no static dc power. Various reflective load topologies are investigated for the optimum phase shift range over the operational bandwidth. The reflective load consists of either high-frequency metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors. The resonance frequency of various states is pushed beyond 40 GHz to get a resonance-free tuning zone. The fully integrated phase shifter is highly miniaturized with an overall device footprint under$0.98\times0.9$mm, fabricated using an eight-layer in-house microfabrication process. The mmWave phase shifter demonstrates measured average insertion loss of 5.25 dB with only ±0.75 dB loss variation over 4 GHz bandwidth at 28 GHz center frequency. The proposed phase shifter exhibits a measured 280° linear phase shift in 256 discrete precision steps over 26 to 30 GHz with a figure-of-merit (FoM) of 53.3°/dB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207