Numerical Analysis to Study the Effect of Control Temperature Location Inside a Datacenter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Modern HVAC control systems lack any sort of a link between the temperature sensors and thermal fields inside closed environments. Whether it is the CRAHBP or a single-unit HVAC system, temperature sensors are coupled with the return air temperature. This connection causes HVAC systems to continue operating until the return air temperature falls below a value defined by an operator. It results in wastage of electricity, because a significant amount of electricity is used to cool down almost the entire closed environment. With rapid advancements in cloud computing services, the expansion of existing and establishment of new datacenters is expected to grow. A major portion of the total electricity consumption in datacenters is consumed by the HVAC equipment. In this work, through high fidelity numerical simulations, we show that a coupling between HVAC sensors and the temperature field in regions of interest inside datacenters can lead to substantial saving of energy. For this study, we consider a tier-2, localized datacenter. It should be noted that the implementation of the proposed flow control method presented in this research work will result in improvement of the overall efficiency of the HVAC system without any major changes to already existing infrastructures of datacenters. Our CFD simulations predict that implementing the proposed control method reduces the power consumption of cooling equipment in the datacenter by 23%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".