BUDAYA DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI DINAS KEPENDUDUKAN DAN PENCATATAN SIPIL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian yang akan dilaksanakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang bermaksud membuat pemaparan secara sistimatis, faktual, dan akurat mengenai fakta–fakta dan sifat–sifat populasi tertentu. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan (field reseach), bersifat kuantitatif dimana penjelasannya bersifat objektif dengan menjelaskan pendekatan- pendekatan yang ada. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh budaya dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai di Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Way Kanan. Penelitian ini bersifat kuantitatif di mana penjelasannya bersifat objektif dengan pemaparan secara sistimatis, akurat, dan faktual mengenai fakta-fakta dan sifat-sifat populasi yang diteliti dengan melakukan analisis data statistika menggunakan software aplikasi SPSS Version 26. Penelitian ini menggunakan 27 responden penelitian. Dari hasil analisis pengolahan data dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada pengaruh secara parsial (sendiri-sendiri) dan secara simultan (bersama-sama) dari variabel Budaya dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Way Kanan Kata kunci: Budaya Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Kinerja Pegawai.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".