MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High Resolution Wildfire Fuel Mapping for Community Directed Forest Management Planning

2022· book-chapter· en· W4312423879 on OpenAlex
Patrick Robinson, Ché Elkin, Scott Green

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueImprensa da Universidade de Coimbra eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental resource managementForest managementAdaptive managementClimate changeGeographyEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceBusinessEcologyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change and institutional forest management practices are leading to more frequent and severe wildfire events around the world, a trend that is projected to increase in coming years. Wildfire plays an important role in maintaining ecological systems, but wildfires also pose threats to health, safety, infrastructure, and important ecosystem services. Reactionary response to these threats has predominantly informed management decisions in recent decades and greater focus on mitigation and adaptation is needed. Through a community directed consultation process, the goal of this work has been to provide direct, operational information to aid in local management decision making for a First Nations community in British Columbia, Canada. Here we use a combination of field sampling and high-resolution Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data to assess vertical and horizontal fuel loading at fine resolution (~10m2). Our analysis found a high degree of fuel loading heterogeneity in areas characterized as homogeneous using coarser fuel layers and provided a means of identifying high fire risk areas that may be targeted for ecosystem rehabilitation aimed at reducing current and future fire risk. We discuss how this spatially explicit data can be used to evaluate feedback between forest dynamics and fuel loading; information critical for managing forests for multiple objectives into the future. Following our analysis, we compiled our results for the community into an interactive decision support web mapping platform designed with the goal of user friendly, accessible land managment planning, avoiding the need for technical expertise and internal capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it