MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid Approach for Stabilizing Large Time Delays in Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control with Reduced Performance Penalties

2022· article· en· W4312426157 on OpenAlex
Kuei-Fang Hsueh, Ayleen Farnood, Mohammad Al Janaideh, Deepa Kundur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCooperative Adaptive Cruise ControlCruise controlComputer scienceTestbedControl (management)Control theory (sociology)Adaptive controlStability (learning theory)Computer networkArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) is a smart transportation solution that can mitigate traffic jams and improve road safety. CACC performance is heavily impacted by communication time delay; moreover, control theory solutions generally compromise control performance by tuning control gains in order to maintain plant stability. We propose a control-machine learning hybrid approach called deep time delay filter (DTDF). DTDF predicts the present (un-delayed) car states given time delayed versions. We successfully train a neural network for the DTDF method and use a physical testbed to show that DTDF can mitigate the effects of constant time delays as large as 5s while maintaining superior control performance compared to that of a baseline control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it