RegTraffic: A Regression based Traffic Simulator for Spatiotemporal Traffic Modeling, Simulation and Visualization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic simulation is a great tool to demonstrate complex traffic structures which can be extremely useful for the planning, development, and management of road traffic networks. Current traffic simulators offer very limited features when it comes to interactive and adaptive traffic modeling. This paper presents RegTraffic, a novel interactive traffic simulator that integrates dynamic regression-based spatiotemporal traffic analysis to predict congestion of intercorrelated road segments. The simulator models traffic congestion of road segments depending on neighboring road links and temporal features of the dynamic traffic flow. The simulator provides a user-friendly web interface to select road segments of interest, receive user-defined traffic parameters (e.g., level of congestion in terms of traffic speed and other road events), and visualize the traffic for the flow of correlated road links based on the user inputs and the underlying correlation of these road links. We experimented RegTraffic in an intersection of Oshawa, ON, Canada. Performance evaluation shows that RegTraffic can effectively predict traffic congestion with a Mean Squared Error of 1.3 Km/h and Root Mean Squared Error of 1.71 Km/h. RegTraffic can effectively simulate the results and provide visualization on interactive geographical maps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".