MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Dynamic Model of Small Modular Reactor Based Nuclear Plant for Power System Studies

2022· article· en· W4312439192 on OpenAlexaff
Bikash Poudel, Kalpesh Joshi, Ramakrishna Gokaraju

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural circulationModular designNuclear reactor coreCoolantNuclear reactorElectric power systemNuclear engineeringNuclear power plantLoad following power plantTurbineEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)Control engineeringComputer scienceBase load power plantMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small modular reactors (SMRs), an emerging nuclear power plant technology, are suitable for large grids as well as remote load centers and offer load following and frequency response capabilities. While the SMRs have expectedly higher response rates, detailed dynamic models including reactor dynamics are necessary for power system dynamic studies. This paper presents a dynamic model of an integral pressurized water reactor (iPWR)-type SMR, modeled in Siemens PTI PSS/E, to assess the contribution of the reactor to the power system dynamics. The proposed SMR model mimics the heat generation process and subsequent heat transfer process with the inclusion of the reactor core based on point kinetics, primary coolant based on natural circulation, and a simplified three lump representation of the steam generator. Controllers are designed to operate the turbine valve and reactor control rod in closed loops. The SMR model is integrated with the modified turbine-governor system and a power system study is conducted. Results show the power system and internal reactor responses when subjected to electrical demand variations of 20% rated electrical output (REO) with a valve rate limit of ±80% REO/min.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineeringFrench-language works237,207