Wildfire-S1S2-Canada: A Large-Scale Sentinel-1/2 Wildfire Burned Area Mapping Dataset Based on the 2017–2019 Wildfires in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wildfires vary across space and time, precisely and timely mapping on the wildfire affected areas is critical for wildfire management, population and property protection, and environmental impact assessment. In this study, we established a large-scale annotated wildfire burned area dataset based on freely available Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 multispectral instrument (MSI) data and Canada Wildfire Burned Area Database. This dataset includes bi-temporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 images, which allows users to exploit remotely sensed data acquired in both optical and microwave domains. On the proposed dataset, we achieved the highest IoU score of 0.86 on the Sentinel-2 data with Siamese U-Net, and the highest IoU score of 0.80 on the Sentinel-1 data using U-Net with early fusion. The combined use of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 failed to bring significant improvement compared to Sentinel-2 based results, but this dataset may have the potential to boost Sentinel-1 based results with Sentinel-2 data for near real-time wildfire progression mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".