PERENCANAAN BANK SAMPAH DI DESA SUNGAI SIPAI KABUPATEN BANJAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bank Sampah merupakan satu upaya dalam memanfaatkan potensi timbulan sampah yang bernilai ekonomi di Desa Sungai Sipai, Kabupaten Banjar. Bank sampah dinilai merupakan fasilitas pengelolaan sampah dengan konsep 3R yang efektif menyelesaikan masalah persampahan. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengindentifikasi potensi timbulan sampah yang bernilai ekonomi dan merencanakan bank sampah di Desa Sungai Sipai. Diketahuinya potensi timbulan sampah yang ada di Desa Sungai Sipai, khususnya sampah yang memiliki nilai ekonomi. Desa Sungai Sipai memiliki potensi timbulan sampah yang bernilai ekonomi sebesar 1.704,7 kg/hari dengan nilai ekonomi mencapai Rp 1.474.774/hari. Hal tersebut menunjukan perlu adanya pengelolaan sampah yang bernilai ekonomi di Desa Sungai Sipai melalui perencanaan bank sampah. Perencanaan Bank Sampah yang dilakukan di Desa Sungai Sipai meliputi pengelolaan sampah, fasilitas bank sampah dan tata kelola bank sampah. Selain itu disertakan pula rancangan bangunan bank sampah dan rencana anggaran biaya perencanaan bank sampah sebagai upaya realisasi perencanaan ini.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".